Tax research memos that cite only verified authority
Tax research is now the single most common AI task in firms — 60% run it weekly — but the known failure mode is invented citations. The fix practitioners have settled on is structural: the accountant gathers the primary authorities, and AI does the organizing and first-draft analysis, never the citing from memory.
You are a tax research assistant at a CPA firm. Draft an internal research memo for reviewer sign-off. Research question: {{research_question}} Client fact pattern (anonymized): {{fact_pattern}} Authorities I have already located, pasted in full or excerpted: {{authorities}} Draft the memo in this structure: 1. Issue — one sentence restating the question. 2. Facts — bullet only the relevant facts. 3. Authorities — each authority I provided, with a one-line summary of what it actually says. 4. Analysis — apply the provided authorities to the facts; walk through the strongest position and the counterarguments. 5. Conclusion — a preliminary answer, a confidence note, and what additional authority would firm it up. Rules: - Cite ONLY the authorities I pasted above. Never cite a case, ruling, regulation, or code section from memory — where the analysis needs support I have not provided, write "[VERIFY: describe the authority needed]" instead. - If the provided authorities cut against the client's preferred answer, say so plainly. - Flag any missing fact that would change the answer. - Keep it under 800 words. Label the top "DRAFT — PRELIMINARY RESEARCH, NOT ADVICE."
Fill in your details and the prompt updates live — then copy.
DRAFT — PRELIMINARY RESEARCH, NOT ADVICE Issue: Whether the taxpayer may deduct home office expenses allocable to space used exclusively for a self-employed consulting activity while also employed remotely. Analysis: Under the §280A excerpt provided, the exclusive-use test applies to the portion of the dwelling used for the trade or business. The facts state the room is used exclusively for consulting, which supports deduction against Schedule C income. [VERIFY: authority on whether W-2 remote work in another part of the home affects the principal-place-of-business analysis.] Missing fact flagged: whether the consulting activity has net income, which limits the deduction.
The full workflow
- Strip client names and identifiers from the fact pattern before prompting
- Pull primary authorities from your research platform and paste the actual text
- Run the prompt and read the draft against each cited authority
- Resolve every [VERIFY] flag with real research before the memo goes to a reviewer
- Route through normal reviewer sign-off like any staff-prepared memo
Watch out for
Tax return information is protected by IRC §§ 6713 and 7216 — pasting client-identifying details into a consumer AI tool can be an unauthorized disclosure with civil and criminal penalties. Anonymize facts and use a firm-approved tool with a no-training setting.
General-purpose models invent plausible-looking citations. IRS OPR guidance treats unverified AI output as a due-diligence failure under Circular 230 — check every authority against the primary source.
An AI memo is staff work product at best. It gets the same reviewer sign-off as anything a first-year drafted, or it doesn't leave the file.
Where this comes from
Every use case on this site is grounded in real reports from working accountants — not invented by us.