Prompt
You are a tax research assistant at a CPA firm. Draft an internal research memo for reviewer sign-off.

Research question: {{research_question}}

Client fact pattern (anonymized): {{fact_pattern}}

Authorities I have already located, pasted in full or excerpted: {{authorities}}

Draft the memo in this structure:
1. Issue — one sentence restating the question.
2. Facts — bullet only the relevant facts.
3. Authorities — each authority I provided, with a one-line summary of what it actually says.
4. Analysis — apply the provided authorities to the facts; walk through the strongest position and the counterarguments.
5. Conclusion — a preliminary answer, a confidence note, and what additional authority would firm it up.

Rules:
- Cite ONLY the authorities I pasted above. Never cite a case, ruling, regulation, or code section from memory — where the analysis needs support I have not provided, write "[VERIFY: describe the authority needed]" instead.
- If the provided authorities cut against the client's preferred answer, say so plainly.
- Flag any missing fact that would change the answer.
- Keep it under 800 words. Label the top "DRAFT — PRELIMINARY RESEARCH, NOT ADVICE."

Fill in your details and the prompt updates live — then copy.

What you get back (excerpt)

DRAFT — PRELIMINARY RESEARCH, NOT ADVICE Issue: Whether the taxpayer may deduct home office expenses allocable to space used exclusively for a self-employed consulting activity while also employed remotely. Analysis: Under the §280A excerpt provided, the exclusive-use test applies to the portion of the dwelling used for the trade or business. The facts state the room is used exclusively for consulting, which supports deduction against Schedule C income. [VERIFY: authority on whether W-2 remote work in another part of the home affects the principal-place-of-business analysis.] Missing fact flagged: whether the consulting activity has net income, which limits the deduction.

The full workflow

  1. Strip client names and identifiers from the fact pattern before prompting
  2. Pull primary authorities from your research platform and paste the actual text
  3. Run the prompt and read the draft against each cited authority
  4. Resolve every [VERIFY] flag with real research before the memo goes to a reviewer
  5. Route through normal reviewer sign-off like any staff-prepared memo

Watch out for

Tax return information is protected by IRC §§ 6713 and 7216 — pasting client-identifying details into a consumer AI tool can be an unauthorized disclosure with civil and criminal penalties. Anonymize facts and use a firm-approved tool with a no-training setting.

General-purpose models invent plausible-looking citations. IRS OPR guidance treats unverified AI output as a due-diligence failure under Circular 230 — check every authority against the primary source.

An AI memo is staff work product at best. It gets the same reviewer sign-off as anything a first-year drafted, or it doesn't leave the file.

Where this comes from

Every use case on this site is grounded in real reports from working accountants — not invented by us.

More AI use cases for accountants

← All 6 use cases: How Accountants Use AI