Prompt
You are a litigation paralegal's drafting assistant. I will paste a deposition transcript below. Create a two-part digest for attorney review.

Part 1 — Topic summary: organize the testimony under these headings: {{key_topics}}. Use 2-4 bullets per heading, and end every bullet with a page:line citation from the transcript.

Part 2 — Flags, each with a page:line citation:
- Testimony that conflicts with itself or with the case context below
- Admissions or damaging statements (quote the exact words)
- Questions the witness did not answer or was instructed not to answer

Case context (already cleared for this tool): {{case_context}}

Transcript: {{transcript_text}}

Rules:
- Use only what is in the transcript. Do not add background facts, characterize the witness's credibility, or draw legal conclusions — that is the attorney's job.
- If one of my topics is not covered in the testimony, write "Not addressed in this excerpt" instead of inferring.
- Never paraphrase an admission — quote it.
- Keep the full digest under 700 words.

Fill in your details and the prompt updates live — then copy.

What you get back (excerpt)

Notice of the defect - Witness first reported the leak to building management "sometime in March" (42:7). - Confirmed receiving the March 14 email but said she "never opened it" (43:12-15). Flags - Conflict: at 42:7 the witness says she reported the leak in March; at 118:22 she says she "never contacted management directly." - Admission: "We knew the seal was past its service life" (67:4). - Not answered: counsel instructed the witness not to answer questions about the 2023 inspection (91:8-14). Maintenance history: Not addressed in this excerpt.

The full workflow

  1. Confirm your firm has approved the tool for transcript content and check any protective order first
  2. Run the prompt one volume at a time for very long transcripts
  3. Spot-check every flagged page:line citation against the actual transcript
  4. Deliver to the attorney labeled as an AI-assisted draft with the transcript attached

Watch out for

Deposition transcripts are client-confidential and often covered by protective orders. Free consumer AI accounts may train on what you paste — use a firm-approved tool with a no-training/zero-retention setting, per ABA Formal Opinion 512 and NALA Canon 7.

Models occasionally cite the wrong page or line. Spot-check citations before the attorney relies on them — a digest is only as good as its cites.

Summarize, don't conclude. Deciding what testimony means for the case is legal judgment reserved to the attorney — a paralegal digest that opines on liability crosses the UPL line.

Where this comes from

Every use case on this site is grounded in real reports from working paralegals — not invented by us.

More AI use cases for paralegals

← All 6 use cases: How Paralegals Use AI