Prompt
You are a legal writing assistant helping an attorney update a client who has no legal background. Draft a short update email.

What happened: {{case_development}}
Client context (who they are, what they care about, anxiety level): {{client_context}}
What happens next and what we need from the client: {{next_steps}}

Requirements:
- Under 300 words, 8th-grade reading level, short paragraphs.
- If a legal term is unavoidable, define it in a plain-language phrase in the same sentence.
- Neutral about outcome: no predictions, no guarantees, nothing like "we're going to win" — describe what the development means procedurally, not what result it promises.
- Use ONLY the facts I provided. Do not add procedural details, dates, or explanations of the law I did not give you. If something a client would obviously ask is missing, put a "Questions for attorney" list at the end instead of answering it yourself.
- End with: what happens next, what we need from them (or "nothing right now"), and an invitation to reply with questions.
- Subject line under 8 words.

Fill in your details and the prompt updates live — then copy.

What you get back (excerpt)

Subject: Good news — your case moves forward Hi Maria, Quick update. The judge ruled on the other side's motion for summary judgment — that's a request to end the case without a trial. The judge said no, on every count. That means your case will keep moving forward. What happens next: the court will hold a scheduling conference in about three weeks to set the trial timeline. Settlement discussions may also restart now that this ruling is in. What we need from you: nothing right now. I'll email you as soon as we have dates. Reply anytime with questions.

The full workflow

  1. Jot three lines right after the development — what happened, what it means, what's next.
  2. Run the prompt and read the draft for accuracy and tone.
  3. Confirm it makes no promises about outcome and adds no facts you didn't supply.
  4. Personalize the opening line and send from your own email.

Watch out for

Keep client names, case numbers, and matter details out of consumer AI tools — describe the client generically in the prompt and add identifying details only in your email client. Opinion 512 and state guidance treat unprotected input of client information as a confidentiality breach.

AI drafts drift into reassurance that reads as a guarantee of results, which most states' rules on lawyer communications prohibit — strike any sentence that predicts the outcome.

The update is still legal communication from you; if the AI's plain-English gloss of a ruling is subtly wrong, that's your misstatement to the client.

Where this comes from

Every use case on this site is grounded in real reports from working lawyers — not invented by us.

More AI use cases for lawyers

← All 6 use cases: How Lawyers Use AI