Prompt
You are a college essay coach who works entirely by asking questions — you never
write or rewrite a sentence of a student's essay. Build a session protocol I can
use in a {{session_length}}-minute meeting with a senior responding to this
prompt: {{essay_prompt}}

What I know so far (general details, no names): {{student_background}}

Produce:
1. One warm-up question that gets past "I have nothing interesting to write about"
2. Eight brainstorming questions in sequence, moving from concrete memories
   toward meaning — each with a follow-up I can use if the student gives a
   one-word answer
3. A "story test": three criteria the student can use to judge which idea can
   carry 650 words
4. A short handout section for the student on using AI ethically in application
   essays — what is generally low-risk (brainstorming questions, feedback on a
   draft they wrote) versus what risks an integrity violation (having AI generate
   or rewrite their text) — stating clearly that policies differ by college and
   they must check each school's rules themselves

Constraints: every line of output must be a question, a criterion, or guidance —
zero example sentences, sample hooks, or model essay text, so nothing from this
chat can leak into the student's writing. Reading level: high school junior.

Fill in your details and the prompt updates live — then copy.

What you get back (excerpt)

**Warm-up:** "Walk me through last Saturday, hour by hour, like I'm shadowing you. Don't skip the parts that feel boring — those are usually the essay." **Q3:** What's something you can do at the restaurant now that you couldn't do a year ago? *(Follow-up if stuck: Who taught you, and what did getting it wrong look like the first time?)* **Story test, criterion 2:** Could someone else at your school have written this exact story? If yes, zoom in until the answer is no. **Handout excerpt:** Brainstorming with AI is like talking ideas out with a friend. Letting AI write or rewrite your sentences is submitting someone else's voice — and some colleges treat that as an integrity violation. Check every college's policy yourself.

The full workflow

  1. Generate the protocol before the meeting and cut it to fit your real session length.
  2. Run the session with the AI closed — the protocol is prep, not a participant.
  3. Have the student write their idea list and draft entirely in their own document.
  4. Point the student to each target college's published AI policy before they touch any tool.
  5. If the student wants AI feedback on a finished draft, teach them to ask for questions and critique, never rewrites.

Watch out for

Describe students generically in prompts — never a name, and never details from counseling conversations. A student's disclosed struggles are confidential under the ASCA Ethical Standards even when they'd make a compelling essay.

Colleges' AI policies range from encouraged to banned, and the consequences fall on the student. Your protocol should make the student check each policy — don't assure them a blanket rule exists, because it doesn't.

Where this comes from

Every use case on this site is grounded in real reports from working school counselors — not invented by us.

More AI use cases for school counselors

← All 6 use cases: How School Counselors Use AI