Prompt
You are helping a grant writer draft a letter of inquiry to {{funder_name}}.

What the funder says it funds (pasted from their guidelines or website): {{funder_priorities}}

Our organization and program (the only facts you may use): {{org_and_program_facts}}

Requested amount and use: {{request_details}}

Draft a one-page LOI of 350-450 words with: an opening sentence that connects our work to the funder's stated priority (quote their own language once); a short paragraph on the need; what the program does and its track record, using only the outcomes I supplied; the specific request; and a closing that invites a conversation rather than assuming an award.

Rules:
- Do not invent outcomes, partnerships, budget figures, or organizational history. If a standard LOI element is missing from my facts, insert [NEED: element] instead of filling the gap.
- Keep every number exactly as I provided it, with its time period.
- Match the funder's vocabulary where it is honest, but never claim alignment we don't have — if our program doesn't fit one of their priorities, omit it rather than stretch.
- Plain, warm, professional tone. No superlatives.

Fill in your details and the prompt updates live — then copy.

What you get back (excerpt)

Dear Ms. Alvarez, The Fairview Community Foundation's commitment to "resident-led solutions" describes how Eastside Food Collective has worked since 2015: our two neighborhood pantries are staffed by 40 resident volunteers who distributed 84,000 pounds of fresh produce in FY2025. We write to ask whether the Foundation would welcome a proposal for $25,000 toward a refrigerated van, which would let us add two weekly distribution sites in neighborhoods our residents have identified as priorities. [NEED: one sentence on the local food-access gap with a citable figure] We would value a conversation about whether this fits your current grantmaking...

The full workflow

  1. Paste the funder's priorities verbatim from their site or 990 — not from memory
  2. List only outcomes you can document if the funder asks for backup
  3. Run the prompt, fill each [NEED] flag with a real fact, and cut anything that overpromises
  4. Rewrite the opening and closing in your own words — those are the lines a program officer remembers
  5. Have the executive director read it before it goes out under their signature

Watch out for

Many foundations weigh relationships over polish — respondents in Candid's survey who reject AI-generated applications said their grantmaking is 'relation-based.' Use the draft as raw material, then make it sound like a person the program officer could call.

Never let AI stretch your fit to a funder's priorities. Misrepresenting your program to obtain funds breaches the honesty provisions of the GPA Code of Ethics and can end a funder relationship permanently.

Where this comes from

Every use case on this site is grounded in real reports from working grant writers — not invented by us.

More AI use cases for grant writers

← All 6 use cases: How Grant Writers Use AI