Prompt
You are a grant writer's drafting assistant for {{organization_name}}, a nonprofit. Draft the statement of need for a grant proposal.

Program context: {{program_summary}}

Community data and evidence (the ONLY facts you may use): {{community_data}}

Funder priorities to align with: {{funder_priorities}}

Output format:
- A statement of need of no more than 400 words, in plain, specific language.
- Open with the problem in concrete local terms, not a global statistic.
- Weave in the data points I provided, keeping every number exactly as written.
- Close with why this organization is positioned to address the need.

Rules:
- Use only the facts, numbers, and sources I provided. Do not add statistics, research findings, or citations from your own knowledge — where stronger evidence would help, insert [DATA NEEDED: describe what to find] instead.
- No filler phrases like "in today's rapidly evolving landscape" and no exaggerated urgency.
- Write in our voice: direct, factual, community-focused.
- After the draft, list any claims that still need a citation before submission.

Fill in your details and the prompt updates live — then copy.

What you get back (excerpt)

In Eastport, more than a third of eighth graders — 38%, per the 2025 state assessment — read below grade level, and the students who need help most have the least access to it. The district's counselor ratio stands at 1:480, leaving little capacity for individualized academic support. Families have noticed: Harbor Youth Alliance's tutoring waitlist grew from 25 students to 61 in just two years, based on our intake records. [DATA NEEDED: neighborhood median income or free/reduced lunch rate to establish economic context] Claims still needing citations before submission: none — all figures trace to the sources provided above.

The full workflow

  1. Pull your strongest local data points and note the source for each before you open the AI tool
  2. Paste the funder's own priority language from their guidelines, not your paraphrase
  3. Run the prompt, then fill every [DATA NEEDED] flag with a real, citable figure
  4. Read the draft aloud and rewrite anything that doesn't sound like your organization
  5. Verify each number against its source one last time before it goes in the proposal

Watch out for

AI invents plausible statistics and citations. Every number in a needs statement must trace to a real source you can hand the funder — presenting fabricated evidence violates the accuracy and honesty requirements in the Grant Professionals Association Code of Ethics.

Never paste beneficiary names, case notes, or client-level records into consumer AI tools. NSF's own guidance warns that non-public information disclosed to public generative AI tools cannot be protected from being recorded and shared.

If the proposal is going to NIH, remember its policy: applications substantially developed by AI will not be reviewed as of September 25, 2025. AI can help arrange your evidence — the ideas and substance must be yours.

Where this comes from

Every use case on this site is grounded in real reports from working grant writers — not invented by us.

More AI use cases for grant writers

← All 6 use cases: How Grant Writers Use AI