Prompt
You are an experienced grant writer for small community nonprofits. Draft a need
statement and program narrative for a grant application.

Our organization: {{org_description}}

The program we're seeking funding for: {{program_description}}

The funder's stated priorities and evaluation criteria (pasted from their RFP or
guidelines): {{funder_priorities}}

Word limit for the narrative: {{word_limit}} words.

Instructions:
1. Open the need statement with the community problem, not our organization.
2. Mirror the funder's own vocabulary from their priorities where it honestly fits our work — do not stretch our program to claim priorities we don't serve; tell me plainly if the fit is weak.
3. Structure the narrative as: need, our approach, who we serve, measurable outcomes, why we're positioned to deliver.
4. Use ONLY the facts, numbers, and outcomes I provided above. Where the narrative needs a statistic or detail I did not supply, insert [NEED: description of what to add] rather than inventing anything.
5. Plain, confident, concrete language. No jargon, no filler phrases like "in today's world."

End with a bulleted list of every [NEED] gap so I can fill them in.

Fill in your details and the prompt updates live — then copy.

What you get back (excerpt)

**Statement of Need** In Harlan and Mercer counties, six towns have no grocery store within 20 miles. For the 450 households our mobile pantry serves each month, food access is a transportation problem before it is a hunger problem — exactly the barrier [Funder Name] has prioritized. Last year, Riverside Food Alliance distributed 310,000 meals through 22 partner pantries, but our fixed sites cannot reach residents without reliable vehicles. [NEED: county food-insecurity rate from Feeding America's Map the Meal Gap for the opening paragraph.]

The full workflow

  1. Paste the funder's actual RFP language into the prompt — funder-priority matching only works with their real words.
  2. Generate the draft, then fill every [NEED] gap with verified numbers from your own records or cited research.
  3. Rewrite the opening paragraph in your own voice; program officers read dozens of AI-flavored openings.
  4. Have a board member or partner read it cold and tell you what the program actually is — if they can't, revise.
  5. Check the funder's application guidelines for an AI-use or disclosure policy before submitting.

Watch out for

Never let AI invent statistics, outcomes, or partner names — a fabricated number in a grant application can end a funder relationship, and misrepresentation on government grants carries legal exposure under the False Claims Act.

Some funders now ask applicants to disclose AI use; check each RFP. A generic, obviously templated narrative hurts you with reviewers even where AI is allowed.

Don't paste confidential client stories or identifiable beneficiary details into consumer AI tools — anonymize first.

Where this comes from

Every use case on this site is grounded in real reports from working nonprofit directors — not invented by us.

More AI use cases for nonprofit directors

← All 6 use cases: How Nonprofit Directors Use AI